Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/4814
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAnacleto Filho, Paulo C.-
dc.contributor.authorColim, Ana-
dc.contributor.authorJesus, Cristiano-
dc.contributor.authorLopes, Sérgio I.-
dc.contributor.authorCarneiro, Paula-
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-30T10:40:14Z-
dc.date.available2026-03-30T10:40:14Z-
dc.date.issued2024-09-12-
dc.identifier.citationAnacleto Filho, P. C., Colim, A., Jesus, C., Lopes, S. I., & Carneiro, P. (2024). Digital and virtual technologies for work-related biomechanical risk assessment: A scoping review. Safety, 10(3), Artigo e79. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety10030079pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn2313-576X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/4814-
dc.description.abstractThe field of ergonomics has been significantly shaped by the advent of evolving technologies linked to new industrial paradigms, often referred to as Industry 4.0 (I4.0) and, more recently, Industry 5.0 (I5.0). Consequently, several studies have reviewed the integration of advanced technologies for improved ergonomics in different industry sectors. However, studies often evaluate specific technologies, such as extended reality (XR), wearables, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaborative robot (cobot), and their advantages and problems. In this sense, there is a lack of research exploring the state of the art of I4.0 and I5.0 virtual and digital technologies in evaluating work-related biomechanical risks. Addressing this research gap, this study presents a comprehensive review of 24 commercial tools and 10 academic studies focusing on work-related biomechanical risk assessment using digital and virtual technologies. The analysis reveals that AI and digital human modelling (DHM) are the most commonly utilised technologies in commercial tools, followed by motion capture (MoCap) and virtual reality (VR). Discrepancies were found between commercial tools and academic studies. However, the study acknowledges limitations, including potential biases in sample selection and search methodology. Future research directions include enhancing transparency in commercial tool validation processes, examining the broader impact of emerging technologies on ergonomics, and considering human-centred design principles in technology integration. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the evolving landscape of biomechanical risk assessment.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.subjectPhysical ergonomicspt_PT
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal disorderspt_PT
dc.subjectTechnologypt_PT
dc.subjectDigitalpt_PT
dc.subjectVirtualpt_PT
dc.titleDigital and virtual technologies for work-related biomechanical risk assessment: A scoping reviewpt_PT
dc.typereviewpt_PT
dc.date.updated2026-03-29T17:30:09Z-
dc.description.versionB613-208E-BF7C | Cristiano de Jesus-
dc.description.versionN/A-
dc.identifier.slugcv-prod-4959857-
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.firstPagee79pt_PT
degois.publication.volume10pt_PT
degois.publication.issue3pt_PT
degois.publication.titleSafetypt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/safety10030079-
Appears in Collections:ADiT-Lab - Publicações indexadas à WoS/Scopus
ESTG - Publicações indexadas à WoS/Scopus



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.