Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/5017
Title: Metacognitive interventions for adolescents with mental disorders: a scoping review
Authors: Espírito Santo, Andreia C. J.
Marques, João P. R.
Silva, Rosa C. G.
Balzan, Ryan P.
Sampaio, Francisco M. C.
Pinho, Lara Guedes
Keywords: Mental disorders
Adolescents
Metacognitive interventions
scoping review
Issue Date: 26-May-2026
Citation: Espírito Santo, A. C., J., Marques, J. P.R., Silva, R. C. G., Balzan, R. P., Sampaio, F. M. C., & Pinho, L. M.G. (2026). Metacognitive interventions for adolescents with mental disorders: a scoping review. Pediatric Research. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-026-05115-z
Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Mental disorders among adolescents are increasing globally, yet access to tailored, evidence-based treatments remains limited. Metacognitive interventions, which target thinking processes influencing emotional regulation and behaviour, have shown promise in adults but remain underexplored in adolescents. This scoping review aimed to map and summarise metacognitive interventions for adolescents (aged 10–19) with mental disorders, examining intervention types, targeted disorders, delivery methods, and reported outcomes. METHODS: Following JBI methodology for scoping reviews, comprehensive searches of published and grey literature were conducted across multiple databases. Reference lists of included full-text articles and relevant reviews were also screened. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies published between 2004 and 2024 were included, most from Europe. Interventions identified included Metacognitive Therapy, Metacognitive Training, Metacognitive Interpersonal Therapy, Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy, Virtual Environment Training with metacognitive components, and the Teen Cognitive-Functional Intervention. These were primarily applied to anxiety, depressive, psychotic, and personality disorders. Delivery formats varied (individual, group, family-inclusive), with most interventions delivered face-to-face in outpatient settings. CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrate the acceptability and feasibility of metacognitive interventions for adolescents, but also highlight gaps, including limited research on certain disorders, inconsistent outcom
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/5017
ISSN: 0031-3998
1530-0447
Appears in Collections:ESS - Publicações indexadas à WoS/Scopus

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s41390-026-05115-z.pdf897.62 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.