Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/3549
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGuerra, Ialuska-
dc.contributor.authorAidar, Felipe J.-
dc.contributor.authorGreco, Gianpiero-
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida-Neto, Paulo Francisco de-
dc.contributor.authorCandia, Michele De-
dc.contributor.authorCabral, Breno Guilherme de Araújo Tinoco-
dc.contributor.authorPoli, Luca-
dc.contributor.authorFilho, Mauro Mazini-
dc.contributor.authorCarvutto, Roberto-
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Ana Filipa-
dc.contributor.authorClemente, Filipe Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorBadicu, Georgian-
dc.contributor.authorCataldi, Stefania-
dc.contributor.authorFischetti, Francesco-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-16T13:50:48Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-16T13:50:48Z-
dc.date.issued2022-03-31-
dc.identifier.citationGuerra, I., Aidar, F.J., Greco, G., De Almeida-Neto, P.F., De Candia, M., Cabral, B. G. De A. T., Poli, L., Filho, M.M., Carvutto, R., Silva, A.F., Clemente, F.M., Badicu, G., Cataldi, S. & Fischetti, F.(2022). Are sEMG, velocity and power influenced by athletes’ fixation in paralympic powerlifting? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(7). Doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074127pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn1660-4601-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/3549-
dc.description.abstractThe bench press is performed in parapowerlifting with the back, shoulders, buttocks, legs and heels extended over the bench, and the use of straps to secure the athlete to the bench is optional. Thus, the study evaluated muscle activation, surface electromyography (sEMG), maximum velocity (MaxV) and mean propulsive velocity (MPV), and power in paralympic powerlifting athletes under conditions tied or untied to the bench. Fifteen experienced Paralympic powerlifting male athletes (22.27 10.30years, 78.5 21.6kg)tookpartintheresearch. The sEMGmeasurementwasperformed in the sternal portion of the pectoralis major (PMES), anterior deltoid (AD), long head of the triceps brachii (TRI) and clavicular portion of the pectoralis major (PMCL). The MaxV, MPV and power were evaluated using an encoder. Loads of 40%, 60%, 80% and 100% 1RM were analyzed under untied and tied conditions. No differences were found in muscle activation between the tied and untied conditions; however, sEMG showed differences in the untied condition between AD and TRI (F (3112) = 4.484; p = 0.005) in the 100% 1RM load, between PMCL and AD (F (3112) = 3.743; p = 0.013) in 60%1RMloadandinthetied condition, between the PMES and the AD (F (3112) = 4.067; p = 0.009). There were differences in MaxV (F (3112) = 213.3; p < 0.001), and MPV (F (3112) = 248.2; p < 0.001), between all loads in the tied and untied condition. In power, the load of 100% 1RM differed from all other relative loads (F (3112) = 36.54; p < 0.001) in both conditions. The tied condition seems to favor muscle activation, sEMG, and velocity over the untied condition.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.subjectMuscle activationpt_PT
dc.subjectDynamic forcept_PT
dc.subjectBench beltspt_PT
dc.subjectBench presspt_PT
dc.subjectParapowerliftingpt_PT
dc.titleAre sEMG, velocity and power influenced by athletes’ fixation in paralympic powerlifting?pt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.date.updated2023-08-30T18:02:41Z-
dc.description.version9E1A-F9DD-3EB8 | Filipe Manuel Clemente-
dc.description.versionN/A-
dc.identifier.slugcv-prod-3057801-
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.volume19(7)pt_PT
degois.publication.titleInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healthpt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph19074127-
Appears in Collections:ESDL - Artigos indexados à WoS/Scopus

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Are sEMG, velocity and power.pdf1.09 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.